Forensic Science International Supplement Series
Volume 1, Issue 1 , Pages 3-6, December 2009

Simulation of hit-and-run road accidents

Dedicated to Prof. Dr. med. István Bajnóczky on the occasion of his 65th birthday

Institute of Legal Medicine, Freiburg University Medical Centre, Albertstrasse 9, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany

Received 16 July 2009; accepted 24 July 2009.

Abstract 

Criminal offences are simulated for manifold reasons and are often associated with the intentional self-infliction of injuries and unrealistic, typically dramatic descriptions of the alleged incident. In the two cases presented here, the injuries were caused accidentally and the motive of the subsequent simulation of a road accident was to divert from previous misconduct.

Case 1

A 33-year-old man was taken to a hospital by his girlfriend with fractures of the pelvis, the left distal lower leg and the metatarsus. According to the friend, the man had been struck and injured by a car as a pedestrian. The driver did not stop after the accident. The physical examination revealed an extensive soft tissue lesion distal to the left inner ankle and on the back of the left foot as well as scratch-like skin lesions on the legs, but no injuries typical of the impact of a car. The external and internal findings were not consistent with the reported collision. Later, the girlfriend admitted that her statements regarding the incident were wrong. According to the police investigations, he sustained the injuries while fleeing after a burglary.

Case 2

An injured 29-year-old woman was found lying on the pavement in front of her house. In the hospital, she stated that she had almost been struck by a van as a pedestrian and had fallen to the ground. She was diagnosed with an open pilon fracture of the right tibia and a fracture of the end plate of the first lumbar vertebra. In view of the findings, the forensic expert expressed doubts as to the alleged fall from a standing position. In an additional interrogation, she admitted that she had jumped from a window of her boyfriend's room on the first floor as she did not want that the fellow occupants got to know about her love affair. In order to cover up the real origin of the injuries, she invented the story of the near-accident and alleged hit-and-run offence.

Conclusion

In both cases the medical findings were not in line with the findings to be expected from the described course of events. In the first case, the traffic accident was simulated to divert from an attempted burglary, in the second case the motive was to prevent the disclosure of an embarrassing love affair.

Keywords: Simulation, Road accident, Hit-and-run offence

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1875-1741(09)00003-2

doi:10.1016/j.fsisup.2009.07.002

Forensic Science International Supplement Series
Volume 1, Issue 1 , Pages 3-6, December 2009